Oscar, the Hospice Cat -- Or Kitty Kevorkian?
by John R. Cole, BAS Board, CSI fellow
Reprinted from the July-September, 2007 BASIS
July 2007 news included the case of a cat named Oscar who allegedly predicted which patients in a hospice would soon die. As SF Chronicle columnist Jon Carroll noted (30 Jul 2007), this seems a bit of a stretch.
“... Oscar’s ‘uncanny knack of knowing when people are going to die’ [looks fishy]. Apparently he walks aloofly around the halls of the Providence, R.I., nursing home where he lives, and then settles down with a person who, only a few hours later, dies. Oscar somehow intuits the imminence of death and provides succor in these last hours - or so the story goes.
“From the evidence, an equally viable theory is that Oscar kills people, but no one has mentioned that possibility.
“The staffers at the nursing home have suggested that perhaps Oscar ‘notices telltale scents,’ although if dying has its own distinctive odor, you’d think someone else would have noticed it by now. Cats don’t have particularly sensitive noses; if a dog was cuddling with pre-croak patients, we might have something.
“Another theory floated is that Oscar notices telltale behavior, although - what might that telltale behavior be? Why haven’t nurses noticed it? Shouldn’t we be hiring nurses who are more perceptive than cats about health issues, particularly imminent death? ‘We all think it’s just a head cold, but that cat says it’s cancer. You might want to get your affairs in order.’ Talk about spooky.
“Besides, the whole story is fishy, you should pardon the expression. Empathy is not really a cat virtue. They rarely notice human quirks that do not directly relate to their own well-being. Horses, by contrast, are herd animals, and are thus exquisitely sensitive to the moods and habits of the beings around them. Maybe the nursing home should hire a horse. ‘Here, Buttermilk, take a look at Mrs. Peterborough.’”
BAS Board Member Norm Sperling suggested, tongue cattily in cheek, that perhaps Oscar is just a cover story for a serial killer on a warped euthanasia mission. I wondered how many laps Oscar actually napped on; in a hospice he was certain to curl up with a dying patient fairly often. Could observers be ignoring “negative hits” and emphasizing positive results? Are weak and dying patients least likely to kick the cat off?
Yes, I suppose it is possible that Oscar can sense something about dying patients beyond immobility–rather like animals are said to sense earthquakes. Trouble is, every study so far of quake-sensing has come up negative–folklore or legend, not fact.
I am not anti-cat–one of my best friends is a cat. I think cats and other pets can seem gentle and concerned when “their humans” are ill. But I also know that there is no actual experimental evidence showing actual empathy in small-brained mammals (as opposed to apes and perhaps dolphins and even elephants). Cats and other pets can clearly show self-interest by being gentle with injured monsters such as the humans they live with. It is very easy to anthropomorphize this–to read too much human emotion and thought pattern into it. Pets are comforting to us, even though they may just be making nice with the weird creatures who open the Purina bag.
And Oscar? Couldn’t he be doing his best to get along and keep the Purina flowing, curling up with humans least likely to kick him out and earning praise from other humans? Maybe showing some appreciation for a quiet snooze? And isn’t a fair amount of human empathy a bit similar to this, as well?
Thanks are due to Jon Carroll for his skeptical take on a cuddly story and for his recognition that there are multiple explanations possible for things—even seemingly “aw, shucks” events.
Return to Menu

Musings on Magic
by Yves Barbero
Reprinted from July-September, 2007 BASIS
.
magic (n.) the power of apparently influencing the course of events by using mysterious or supernatural forces. (Oxford Dictionary, 10th Edition)
Perfectly willing to leave my critical filters at the door, I went to see the latest Harry Potter movie with a friend. I only expect a story to be consistent within its own framework. Magic exists in the Harry Potter universe and I accept it for the duration. I’d found earlier Potter movies to be a bit flat in their story-telling since each character appears to be fulfilling a function rather than fully being human. Even the support of acting luminaries such as Maggie Smith and Alan Rickman could do little to save these films.
Perfectly willing to leave my critical filters at the door, I went to see the latest Harry Potter movie with a friend. I only expect a story to be consistent within its own framework. Magic exists in the Harry Potter universe and I accept it for the duration. I’d found earlier Potter movies to be a bit flat in their story-telling since each character appears to be fulfilling a function rather than fully being human. Even the support of acting luminaries such as Maggie Smith and Alan Rickman could do little to save these films.
As I watched the film, somewhat bored, my mind began to wander. Our colleague, Bob Steiner, a past president of The Society of American Magicians, and long-time activist in the skeptical community, was indignant when a psychic claimed to have a power given to her by God. He expressed his outrage at a meeting that I also attended in Marin County, California, some years ago. What had been an urbane exchange between those who believed in psychics and those who didn’t, exploded. To my delight, he shattered the polite acceptance of claims by psychics. Even in the country of hot tubs and peacock feathers, there is nothing mellow about an outraged Bob Steiner when it comes to facing people making grand and unsubstantiated claims.
This got me to thinking about the Nazis. Many at the top of their food chain (including Hitler according to some sources) believed in psychic phenomena. They acted on it (it was cosmic destiny for the master race), and millions died. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thule_Society.
In Lenin’s Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire (1994), David Remnick, the Pulitzer Prize winning author, reported how a psychic was featured regularly and prominently on state television to distract the masses from the economic problems under Leonid Brezhnev’s deteriorating regime. This, in a country that claimed the equality of the masses. How could one man have such abilities without it being shared in a proper socialist manner? But then, magical thinking has never been logically consistent.
Novels, unlike politics, must have an internal logic to work, and J. K. Rowling, the author of the series, makes a valiant and usually successful attempt.
But Rowling is only trying to entertain. There’s nothing sinister about her motives. The fact that she got millions of kids to read makes me tip my hat to her and bow deeply, I can only hope that once bitten, these kids will continue to read. “I don’t care what you read,” a high-school English teacher once told us, “but read!” He made us periodically bring in a list of books we read. He glanced at my usual list of Science Fiction books (cheap Ace paperback doubles predomin-ating), and accepted it. I was not into serious literature in 1960-61, but Heinlein, Asimov and Clarke were at their most productive. And there were plenty of others to fill in the gaps while they furiously wrote.
It is possible that we Americans probably miss the most obvious problem with Rowling’s works. It creates a class of people different from the rest of us, and gives them authority over us. For me, starting with the exclusive Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, which resembles English public schools (actually private schools), it smacks too much of the English class system. Why should one group of people be better as a class than another? This leads to magical thinking, and other social ills, such as racism.
The notion of muggle, people without magic, has a weird resemblance to colorism, a concept of worth by how white a person looks. In America, this was not pervasive. In true puritanical absolutism, “one drop” of blood made you wholly an African-American. But in areas with foreign antecedents, such as New Orleans, it did exist. And it still exists all over Latin America.
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muggles) devotes a page to half-bloods, mudbloods, squibs, and others, who have ancestry that isn’t “pure” wizardry. Is this much different from the colorism notion of octoroons, quadroon, or quintroon (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octoroon) that describes degrees of whiteness? In both cases, there is a degree of worth imposed by circumstances the individual cannot possibly have control over. It is clear that Rowling did not consciously intend such an outcome, but it is there, and kids read the stuff, and it forms lifelong notions.
The Catholic Church in Europe has been reported to have strong opposition to the Harry Potter series. Their clergy has always been “called” by God to serve as intermediaries for their membership. They can exclusively forgive sins, and execute rituals that the membership must take part in to go to heaven. This is far different from other professions. Potentially, any person can become a doctor or a lawyer, or a journeyman construction worker (such as myself), by studying, taking exams, and serving some sort of internship or apprentice-ship. But you must be “called” to be a priest.
Similarly, the United States has seen opposition from certain fundamentalist groups. In their scheme, God gives the ability to read his thoughts to a limited number of divines. Throwing out the teachings of Martin Luther, who thought that no clergy should come between the individual and God, they have set themselves up as the new intermediaries. This is sometimes called dominio-nism, especially if coupled with a political program that wants to overthrow the secular traditions of U.S. Government.
Both these religious trad-itions understand that the suggestion of another hierarchical authority based on individual power is a threat, especially if the kids start making associations comparing the Ministry of Magic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Magic) with the Vatican or Focus on the Family (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_on_the_Family). These religious authorities just don’t want the competition.
Mainline churches in the more Protestant tradition of Martin Luther, and humanized by the Enlightenment, don’t seem much threatened.
Many of the reviews I’ve read of Rowling’s last book in the series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hollows, suggest reading Philip Pullman’s masterful series, His Dark Materials, of which I’ve nearly completed the first of three books, The Golden Compass (1995). They imply it is a better series, but I think that the true appeal is that magic is more a process than an inborn or heaven-ordained ability. A skilled practitioner (university educated) can do it in Pullman’s series. It is not limited to a particular class but is a learned skill. Pullman paints his own rich world, with markers we can all understand to our own world, instead of inserting a secretive world in the shadows,
Like J. R. R. Tolkien and Ursula K. Le Guin (The Earthsea series consisting of five novels and several short stories) Pullman’s human characters are more fully drawn, and are not just ciphers for an ability, and that’s a plus in any literature.
Return to Menu
One Year $25
|
Two Years $40
|
Three Years $60
|
Donate to Bay Area Skeptics
|
|
Return to Menu

“I want to believe”: A Skeptics Appraisal to the book:
“UFO Abductions: A Dangerous Game” by Philip J Klass
by Tony Scuderi, Psy.D., D.Min.
Reprinted from July-September, 2007 BASIS
As I reviewed this book, I could not help but remember a line from the television show, The X Files, In one episode, Agent Molder, played by David Ducovney, is approached by another agent in the FBI who says, “ So, Spookey, are you looking for little green men?” Molder’s response went something like this, “ No! Actually they’re gray. And from Reticulon.”
It was remarkable how similar the book, UFO Abductions: A Dangerous Game, was to The X-Files. It appeared as though the creator to the X-Files read Klass’ book and then researched such classic movies as the 1951 The Day the Earth Still. In both the television show and the movie, the United States encounters “aliens” from another planet. In the movie, the late great actor Michael Rennie plays the part of a humanoid whose mission it is to meet the earth governments to tell them that if the peoples of the Earth don’t stop the violence, the world will be annihilated by those who have been watching humanity’s progress. Typical of the response of a paranoid America and World, this emissary is met with disbelief and violence. Rennie’s companion, who is his protector, is an extremely tall metal creature named, Gort. The “brave” Americans have orders to kill this “invader”, which eventually they do, Rennie gives Patricia Neal, a single mother who befriended him, instructions to hurry to his ship and give Gort the following message: “Gort. Klato Barada Nicto!” If she does not hurry, Gort will destroy the planet. The movie concludes with Gort bringing Rennie back to life. Chastised humans gather around the spaceship for Rennie’s final speech to the nations before they leave Earth.
For the most part The X-Files is similar, except that the series very frequently centered around abductions, cloning, secrecy, and the belief that aliens were on the planet before humans evolved. The X-Files intrigue starts with Molder’s sister being abducted by aliens as a child. Molder eventually becomes an FBI agent and his primary goal is to work on The X-Files (those confidential files on alien beings infiltrating the Earth) as a way to find his sister. Several episodes of the series included cloning alien-human hybrids. Molder’s partner with the FBI, Agent Dana Scully, appears to have been abducted, given an implant (transmitter) in the back of her neck, tracked for years by the aliens, and given birth to what may be a super human, omniscient, alien-human hybrid.
The amazing thing about The Day the Earth Stood Still, and The X-Files is the amount of paranoia exhibited and the secrecy the government places on the existence of extraterrestrials. Both attempt to, if you’ll excuse the expression, “probe” into the truth of people’s experiences of the UFOnauts by using hypnosis and then compare the victims’ stories to discover consistencies. The response of the Government in The Day the Earth Stood Still is to seek and destroy the invader. It appears that the government wants to grab the Gray Alien to study and discover its powers. Interestingly, when a human is abducted, “probed,” people are appalled. But it is apparently OK for us to do so to them.
Now we come to Klass’ book UFO Abductions. The reported alien encounters are similar to those in The X Files but the abductions Klass reviews occurred in the 1970’s and 1980’s. The first part of the book, up to Chapter 12, discusses the experiences of several abductees. Hypnosis is the primary tool used to uncover the repressed memories of the alien abductions. Through relaxation and certain cues by the hypnotherapist, these memories are uncovered and unquestionably viewed as authentic. If someone believes in Little Gray Men with big eyes and egg shaped heads with small mouths and little noses, or were told that this is what aliens look like, under hypnosis each so called, “abducted” person, will describe the Grays very much that way. In fact, the hypnotherapist can plant a suggestion to the relaxed person so that the person describes exactly that. As Klass correctly points out, a hypnotized person will not do anything they wouldn’t ordinarily do. The key word is “do”. That doesn’t mean that the hypnotized person won’t say what the hypnotherapist wants him or her to say.
The other issue that Klass brings out in his book that is common in the aforementioned X-Files, is that all the abductees are taken into the space ship and examined. They are probed, lose time, and are repeatedly re-abducted. While the exact motivation of the aliens is not absolutely clear, there is a continuing thread in the stories that supports the belief that the UFOnauts want to mix races by removing a female human’s ovum and placing it in an alien woman. I can only hope that the aliens are carbon based.
In his book, Klass also discusses how the space ships land, usually in fields, and leave what have been known as “crop circles,” landing sites for the alien ships. Crop circles have been so thoroughly discredited in the last decade that it is not necessary to go into that story. The evidence showing that crop circles are man made, and almost always by pranksters, is overwhelming. The farmers make them, not alien ships! When I flew on a commercial jet from Philadelphia to California, I saw crop circles and multiple crop circles attached to one another that looked like, unless the farmer had a blueprint, something extraterrestrial. Just for fun, I want you, for a moment, to pretend I just hypnotized you.
Under hypnosis, I ask you, a believer in alien abductions, if you remember any crop circles when the space ship either took off from the earth or returned to earth. What would your answer be? Chances are you would affirm the existence of crop circles.
Now, as we continue in this hypnotic trance, I now ask you if while aboard the space ship the aliens put you on what appeared to be an operating table and began a humiliatingly thorough physical examination. Chances are, you may say that was in fact your experience. These fabricated stories might well make a great television series!
The photos in Klass’ book are worth spending some time on. I found it amazing that the woman standing next to the short Gray in Plate #4 looks disturbingly similar to the Gray. Could that Gray be her son or daughter? Could that alien be part of this woman’s abduction experience? Or, is that photo doctored to show similarities? Other photos in Klass’ book depict “actual” and drawn pictures of UFOnauts – and they all look like the aliens described by agent Molder on the X-Files. They are unfailingly gray with oval or mushroom shaped heads. They have big black eyes, thin noses, and small or no mouths. Additionally, the aliens have no ears; they float instead of walk and seem to communicate telepathically.
So, what do you the reader believe? Are we visited by creatures of another world? Are they gray, green, or do they resemble us? If we are visited, why doesn’t radar detect their space ships? Are the ships cloaked like the Klingon Bird of Prey ships of Star Trek? Does life exist on other planets? If so, will we ever meet our neighbors? Are they friendly or not? Will we, if we do meet them, want to destroy them or probe them to see what makes them tick? Maybe we are already doing that in Area 51.
Personally, I think that anyone who believes that we are the only intelligent life in the universe is remarkably foolish. The universe is a big place. Logically, we can’t be alone. Are we being visited by people from outside our solar system or within our solar system? “I want to believe!” How about you?
Tony Scuderi, Psy.D, D.Min., CACD, CCS, is a clinician at Richmond Area Multi-Services, Inc. (RAMS) in San Francisco and has taught at the college level for many years.
Related from an earlier BASIS (Sept.-Oct., 2002), “The Science Fiction Rule” at http://www.baskeptics.org/sfr-intell-sept-oct2002.htm.
Return to Menu

Aromatherapy: Does It Pass the Smell Test?
by Paul DesOrmeaux
Reprinted from July-September, 2007 BASIS
Aromatherapy is only one of oodles of alternative medicines and holistic treatments that have currently captured part of the public’s wild imagination. These holistic approaches, including acupuncture, therapeutic touch, and mall shopping, are part of a multi-billion dollar industry.
What exactly is aromatherapy? By dismantling the word, you’d think that it would be related to odors, but you’d only be partially correct. And since evidence of its therapeutic properties is wanting, it’s not even really therapy. In other words, if we remove the two main words from the term, we end up with, well, nothing. So this could be an article about nothing. But since aromatherapy is part of the holistic hullabaloo, for arguments’ sake, let’s assume it exists.
Like all holistic treatments, aromatherapy purports to work on the whole body: the physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and wallet. Aroma does play a part, but therapeutic claims also include the application of oils on the skin and, to a lesser extent, ingestion.
Like most other alternative medicines, aromatherapy relies solely on “natural” ingredients—no synthetics or preservatives are invited—to soothe the psyche and cure the cooties in an earthy sort of way. Aromatherapy’s main ingredients are plant-derived essential oils, which can offer a magical band-aid for all physical and psychological disorders under Aquarius, from asthma to zirconium poisoning.
For some, alternative medicines complement the mainstream medicine and therapeutic practices that gained their dubious reputations by actually curing diseases and offering relief. To be fair, since holistic treatments are held in such high regard, there must be hundreds of peer-reviewed studies available, especially if it’s on equal footing with quirky, unpredictable, pie-in-the-sky conventional medicine. So start your studies’ scavenger hunt now and call me with your list in a few days. Not to worry; if you don’t find any, just invent them.
One of aromatherapy’s undisputed selling points is its historical roots. Practitioners of, and believers in, holistic medicine forever embrace the overly romantic idea that there’s some cosmic connection among mind, body, spirit, and environment, a biopsychosocial sphere (say it fast five times) that somehow promotes a healthy life. In other words, simply stated, natural plants are good for you, such as tobacco.
It’s apparently logical for some to think that if the “natural” substances distilled from plants, shrubs, flowers, trees, roots, bushes, or seeds worked for the advanced cultures from thousands of years ago, why not us? Hell, why can’t our life expectancy be the mid-30’s, too?
Of course, essential oils have a much more romantic image than some of the alternative treatments ancient Egyptian physicians might have recommended to their patients, such as magic potions, animal dung, fly droppings and cooked mice.(I’d mention magical amulets, but they’re currently for sale on the internet.) To say the least, there must have been a colorful hodgepodge of merchandise in their pharmacies.
Unlike today, diseases then were thought to be caused by pissing off the gods, who would, in turn, give you such a pinch. Ah, the good old days, when pig entrails were sometimes used to predict the future. If there’s one issue we can agree on it’s that although we can admire much about the ancients’ accomplishments, medical cures ain’t one of them.
The roots, then, of aromatherapy, date back to more than 4,000 years ago. India and Egypt have been widely accepted as the countries where it originated. Both civilizations used these essential oils for bathing, massages, and cosmetics. Their curative properties, the ones in abundance today, weren’t appreciated back then.
For illnesses, they relied on tried-and-true curatives, such as prayers, rituals, and sacrificing goats, which are still practiced the world over today, minus the goat sacrifice. For pain relief, herbs were preferred. Since diseases and deaths were acts of crabby, grouchy gods, magic was employed to please them, along with a lute-and-lyre rock concert now and then. Aromatic-type fumes were also a part of peoples’ daily lives, to the point of being sacred.
Uses for essential oils were eventually passed down to the Greek and Romans, possibly for treating tunic and toga chafing. Greek and Roman physicians were the first to apply these oils to treat infections, although their success was dubious. Hippocrates’ writings recom-mended aromatic baths and oily massages as practices for good health. Some Greek physicians treated wounded gladiators with botanical remedies. With all those gods hanging around creating mischief, you’d have thought that at least one would have introduced an antibiotic or something.
The Black Plague struck in the late 1340s. Theories about its origins included angry gods, planetary alignments, and evil stares. When it was finally over, by some estimates, up to two-thirds of the European population had died. Botanical remedies were tried, with no success. They had failed the ultimate test and temporarily fell out of favor. For some reason, prayers survived intact.
Finally during the 19th century, after millions of years of unnecessary human suffering, some gods or god finally decided to let scientists in on a little secret: diseases are caused by microbes. This discovery led to the introduction of a number of life-saving practices, such as sanitation, injections, disease prevention, antibiotics and modern medicine in general. As was to be expected, it dampened the enthusiasm for essential-oil remedies; they were placed in Museum for Questionable Cures, alongside bloodletting and animal urine.
As you’ll see, however, it’s hard to keep an attractive, persistent pseudoscience down. In 1928 French chemist and perfumist Rene-Maurice Gattefosse led a revival in aromatherapy. As the story goes, while working in the lab, probably on Chanel #1, a fire burnt Gattefosse’s arm. Quickly, he dipped it into the nearest vat filled with what he assumed was H2O. As fate would have it, it was lavender oil. Luckily for the nutty professor, it wasn’t hydrochloric acid. According to Gattefosse his pain immediately subsided and his burns healed quicker than expected, with very little scarring.
With this painstaking, meticulous, 30-second, Gattefosse-reviewed “experiment” completed, he wrote an article touting the benefits of essential oils and coined the term “aromatherapy” after rejecting the term “rene-mauricegattefossetherapy.”
Was Gattefosse’s burn checked by a physician? What degree burn did he have? Who confirmed the burns? Who knows? Apparently, history is relying on variations of this pleasant little tale. In any case, Gattefosse spent the rest of his life studying and promoting aromatherapy, including its anti-microbial effects, more commonly known as wishful thinking.
In 1937 he published the quintessential aromatherapy book with a lengthy French title, which was trimmed-down in the English version to Gattefosse’s Aromatherapy (still available today). He’s considered to be the father of aromatherapy.
Although Britain and France, along with other countries in the eastern hemisphere, embraced this new therapy over the next several years, it wasn’t until the 1980’s when New Age Americans were first snookered.
For the ancients, it made some sense that plants and shrubs might prove beneficial. After all, humans needed plants to live. Essential oils might have seemed logical to those who had no idea that diseases were caused by microbes or genetic disorders. What else made sense, “Here, take two rocks, pray to some invisible grump, and get plenty of rest”?
Since many of these essential oils have been available for at least 4000 years, one would think that by now there’d be universal agreement on their effectiveness based on scientific testing. You’d be wrong. In fact, no supposed “cure” from the ancients survives today, unless you believe prayer is going to clear up your genital warts.
Current practitioners of aromatherapy have concocted dozens of different oily products to relieve stress, invigorate the body, cure diseases, and lubricate a door hinge. Generally, the essential oil is mixed with a neutral oil (like vegetable oil) and massaged into the body (to be absorbed through the skin), added to bathwater, inhaled, or ingested (not generally recommended).
According to aromatherapists, purity is required for good therapeutic results; no synthetics or preservatives need apply. In other words, only the manufacturers have the proper equipment to extract the substances to produce the pure, high-quality oils. And, surprisingly, the best oils come from organic plants you can’t ordinarily grow in your backyard. Otherwise, we’d simply be able to pick a bunch of geraniums from our gardens and cure just about anything after running them through our juicers.
The list of beneficial oils and their endless uses is confusing and, frankly, embarrassing. Depending on which aroma-therapist you reference — it’s not an exact science (or exactly a science) — different oils will allegedly treat different maladies. As one aromatherapist claims, “There is a plant for every illness.”
Following is only a fraction of various disorders and their oily treatments: insomnia, congestion and colds (basil); antiseptic, toothaches, and respiratory infections (clove); skin infections (eucalyptus); ulcers, skin care, laryngitis (frankincense); kidney stones, calming effect on the nervous system (geraniums); stomach acidity (lemon); headaches, fevers, colds (mint); and sedative (orange). Lavender and geranium oils are also purported to be antimicrobial agents.
If you need some psycho-logical aromatherapy, try these: easing of anger (chamomile); promoting alertness (eucalyptus); calming, relieving pain (lavender); insomnia (mandarin orange blossom); anxiety and stress (ylang-ylang…goes the trolley).
In addition, unsubstantiated biophysical actions include stimulation of cellular activity and activation of capillary circulation, elimination of toxins, and oxygenation of blood, helping the body to heal itself, relieving pain, reversing constipation, energizing the sympathetic nervous system, and improving your ability to play the harmonica.
One “study” even “proved” that penile blood flow is increased by the combined scents of lavender and pumpkin pie. Instead of only watching football, men would have something else to do on Thanksgiving Day.
Since New-Age adherents are generally insatiable “energy” junkies, they necessarily apply the concept to aromatherapy. Once again there’s discussion of some vague, ubiquitous “energy field” emanating from the human body. However, it’s not actually the oils’ chemicals that are reacting with the human “energy field,” but it’s the plant oils’ “life force” that will neutralize or shoo away the nagging, negative energy vibrations from our bodies. You see, essential oils have a “spiritual dimension.” They restore “balance” and “harmony” to one’s body and to one’s life. The needle on the wacky meter is straining past the 180-degree mark.
It’s also purported that some oils may influence our “chakras,” seven vortexes and whirling balls of energy in the human body related to our physical, emotional, mental and spiritual well-being; that is, if they’re open and spinning at the same rate to each other. And I thought all that activity was just my stomach grumbling.
If the wacky meter hasn’t shattered just yet, another “theory” floating around in the ether is that essential oils may involve some kind of bio-electrical frequency. How long will it be before we’re not only tip-toeing through the tulips, but talking to them, too?
Let’s see: energy fields…life forces…negative energy… positive energy…bio-electrical frequencies…chakras. Excuse the momentary digression but should we be paying teachers more? Maybe smaller class sizes? School dress codes?
One problem with aromatherapy as a feel-good, rediscovered substitute for, or complement to, standard medicine is that almost all available evidence is anecdotal, which is mostly pseudoscientific “proof.” But for many people, stories are exciting, statistics suck. At best, other than the placebo effect, there’s insufficient proof of the effectiveness of aromatherapy; that is, unless you discovered something on your scavenger hunt.
Can aromatherapy at least make a scientific claim that smells can relax us? Perhaps. Most can agree that pleasant smells can produce positive responses. Pine, for example, may remind someone of the joys of Christmas. On the other hand, it might remind someone else that grandma got run over by a reindeer.
Certain aromas may change the way we breathe; calm breathing calms the mind. Since some legitimate studies have connected stress to heart disease and even cancer, relaxing isn’t a bad thing. Not many of us, however, can surround ourselves with pleasant-smelling oils 24/7. Even with a lemon hanging from your rearview mirror, the octogenarian who cuts you off in traffic is going to immediately send adrenaline coursing through your chakras.
The aroma in aromatherapy can also be part of a pleasant ritual. Go ahead, start up your bathtub, light a forest of scented candles, pour some pleasant-smelling essential oils in the warm water, lie back, and enjoy. Just don’t expect the experience to resolve your restless-leg syndrome. But do consumers really need to be told and sold what smells swell? And is the previous question rhetorical?
Also, a massage with essential oils can be a relaxing experience; that is, unless it’s the type of massage where law enforcement might raid the premises. But will the oils your skin absorbs actually help to kill bacteria and viruses and stimulate the body’s immune system? Maybe on Atlantis.
So, what’s the harm if people believe in aromatherapy’s nonexistent health benefits? Besides another stick in the eye of critical thinking, they can be dangerous. Certain essential oils can produce serious allergic reactions in certain people. When combined with some legitimate prescriptions, the oils can prove harmful, even fatal. A number of people have refused curative traditional medicine and instead embraced alternative treatments, which killed them. Some essential oils are toxic if ingested. Looking on the sunny side of life, it may be nature’s way of thinning the herd.
And how do you know if an aromatherapist is legitimate? Good freaking luck. No government-issued certification or license is required. Neither aromatherapy nor essential oils are regulated by the government. If you cut or style hair, however, you must be licensed. Not surprisingly, alternative medicine schools not only boast classes in oils, massage techniques, etc., but also on starting businesses and marketing.
Is aromatherapy considered a complementary or alternative medicine (CAM)? Both. The recent emphasis on the word “complementary” is obviously an attempt to give the movement more legitimacy. It’s easier to expose a worthless, stand-alone treatment (alternative) than a worthless treatment that complements an authentic one. Was it the massage or morphine that relieved the pain? For some, the answer is obvious; for others, a good friend of mine is selling magical amulets.
Regardless, aromatherapy continues to be big business. Aromatherapy oils, bath gels, soaps, teas, dried flowers, and lotions are popping up everywhere, crying out for our maxed-out charge cards. Essential oils are found in homes, clinics, beauty salons and spas. Aromatherapists are flourishing. CAM books are selling like chakra candles. The list grows on and on.
Once in awhile, folks, take a deep breath and think. You don’t need to be a Mensa member to understand that almost everything about the complementary and alternative medicine movement in general, and the aromatherapy movement more specifically, smells fishy.
Humorist Paul DesOrmeaux teaches writing at the Rochester Institute of Technology and Monroe Community College. His goal is to introduce skepticism to a broader audience by combining reason and science with humor/satire to expose myths, pseudoscience, fraudulent claims, and nonsensical ideas.
Return to Menu